Waisanen v township of superior1/18/2024 ![]() (c) A claim for adverse possession, acquiescence for the statutory period, or a prescriptive easement. (2) In an action involving the recovery or the possession of land, including a public highway, street, alley, easement, or other public ground, a municipal corporation, political subdivision of this state, or county road commission is not subject to any of the following:… This legislation, known as MCL 600.5821 clarifies the statute analyzed in Waisanen and confirms that protections against adverse possession extend not only to state agencies but municipalities. In response to this decision, the legislature has passed House Bill 4747. Superior Township, 305 Mich App 719 (2014) that held that a statute that protected state agencies from adverse possession claims did not apply to municipalities. In this blog post, I described the decision in Waisanen v. Superior Township case that allowed adverse possession claims against municipal property owners. ![]() New legislation has been enacted overruling the Waisanen v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |